Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Lecture Reflections: Lecture 9



Lecture 9: News Values

 

“News values are one of the most opaque structures of meaning in modern society … Journalists speak of ‘the news’ as if events select themselves … Yet of the millions of events which occur daily in the world, only a tiny proportion ever become visible as ‘potential news stories’; and of this proportion, only a small fraction are actually produced as the day’s news …”

 

Stuart Hall 1973

 

So who and what decides which events become the news?

 

Are there defining news values that are universal, or are they specific to culture, audience and outlet?     

 




The concept of news values is dynamic, the values change according to the importance or insignificance of factors that relate to society and the world today. However there are some universal traits within journalism and communication that determine the degree of prominence a story is give in the daily news. Dr Redman asked us to step back for a minute and consider what a day’s news report or front page of a newspaper might look like if the popular news values (that measure an events newsworthiness) were not fulfilled. The news pyramid that directs the reader’s attention would cave in on itself as the most news worthy story would flop dismally. Following Galtung and Ruge’s three hypothesis theory and the exclusion hypothesis, “events that satisfy none of very few of the (news worthiness) factors will not usually become news.”

News Values Defined: Guidelines that decide news worthiness and prominence.

Impact: A news story that is going to have a high impact on a large amount of people. “News is anything that makes the reader say ‘Gee Whiz!’.” 

Audience Identification: A news story that relates to your audience, therefore appropriate to their culture, interests, location, or world news of high interest. 

Pragmatics: A news story that is practical in a reporting sense and often relates to current affairs; a story that doesn’t compromise any news ethics. 

Source Influence: the degree of influence other sources have had on the facticity of the story, the truth, how accessible a story is or how much spin is put into a story. An example of this struggle between reporting truth and source influence is the relationship between journalism and public relations. 

Other general rules within the industry, that are not necessary learned but become instinctive, are “if it bleed it leads” or “if its local it leads”. Stories that feature accidents, death, disasters and danger will lead the headlines; events such as this satisfy news factors such as negativity (bad news) and drama. These are the events that relate well to audience interest but are also stories that conflict with news ethics. This would call for consideration of how a journalist presents a story so as to fulfill these news values but also conform to ethical news reporting.  
Promotions within commercial media focus heavily on local stories and use this news value to draw in their audience by making their local community “the news, seen first on channel nine” for example. This spin on a story satisfies factors like proximity and relevance. 

When looking at how news worthiness is determined in a journalism environment, key qualities that direct this decision making are not always solely the qualities of a journalist.

“A sense of news values” is the first quality of editors – they are the “human sieves of the torrent of news”, even more important even than an ability to write or a command of language.

Harold Evans -Editor of The Sunday Times 1967 to 1981

As evens says ‘a sense of news values’ is essential to deciding what runs as the news on any given day, he also speaks of the importance of the ‘College of Osmosis’, a concept that works around the practical learning in an industry environment to nurture the instinctive skills or ‘sense’ that direct a journalist’s decision of how to present a story.
The news values acknowledged by editors, journalists and PR personnel alike, can be conformed to a list of a dozen common factors. However, with our ever changing world and the changing of culture, what is current and interesting is not always what has traditionally been important or newsworthy. This is the reason so many professionals and academics have theorised these news values with their own interpretation of important news added to this ever expanding list.  Just a few of the foundation values and some of the newly added, and newly appropriate, values can be seen below. 

Some Newsworthiness Factors:


Some classics! 


Negativity (bad news) 

Proximity (Local News or geographically relevant) 

Uniqueness (New news or an unusual event) 

Elitism (stories that follow people, nations or organisations that are of public importance or have a great deal of power/influence) 

Continuity (a story that has been or has the potential to be of public interest for a prolonged period of time, for example the Olympics) 

And some newly relevant factors! 


Visual attractiveness (stories that can be presented in a visually attractive way, appropriate for TV reporting or online news where use of info graphics etc. can be applied) 

Celebrification of the journalist (how much involvement a journalist has in a story, programs such as ‘A Current Affair’ and ’60 Minutes’ use their journalists as a hook for a story) 

Terrorism (the us and them concept slighting altered to feature the underlying fear or scare factor of terrorism following events such as the September 11th Attack and the 2005 London Bombings)

The Global Financial Crisis (reports of the stock market are now rarely not reinforced by results of the GFC) 

No comments:

Post a Comment